- PII
- S30345340S1024708425020114-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034534025020114
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 2
- Pages
- 122-134
- Abstract
- The effect of instantaneous energy release (explosion) in the gas bubble region on supersonic flow past blunt bodies (sphere) and pointed bodies (ogival body and cone-cylinder combination) is considered when the explosion occurs in unperturbed freestream flow in the immediate neighborhood of the bow shock. Physically, such an effect on the flow can occur with energy input in the region of electric gas discharge or with detonation of a combustible gas mixture inside the bubble. It is found that, in addition to the direct effect of the explosive shock wave on the surface of the body, significant non-stationary changes in the gas-dynamic flow regimes past the bodies occur during the interaction of the bow shock with the dynamically varying explosion region (shockcompressed layer and cavity). In particular, focusing and cumulation effects, which can lead to secondary effects, are noted. The momentum of the latter is comparable to or even greater than the momentum of the direct impact of the blast wave.
- Keywords
- газовый пузырь взрыв фокусировка кумуляция сверхзвуковое обтекание тел головная ударная волна импульсное воздействие
- Date of publication
- 01.02.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 20
References
- 1. Haas J.-F., Sturtevant B. Interaction of Weak Shock Waves with Cylindrical and Spherical Gas Inhomogeneities // J. Fluid Mechanics. 1987. V. 181. P. 41–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112087002003
- 2. Quirk J., Karni S. On the Dynamics of a Shock-Bubble Interaction // J. Fluid Mechanics. 1996. V. 318. P. 129–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096007069
- 3. Zabusky N., Zeng S. Shock Cavity Implosion Morphologies and Vortical Projectile Generation in Axisymmetric Shock–Spherical Fast/Slow Bubble Interactions // J. Fluid Mechanics. 1998. V. 362. P. 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112097008045
- 4. Ranjan D., Oakley J., Bonazza R. Shock-Bubble Interactions // Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 2011. V. 43. P. 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160744
- 5. Apazidis N., Eliasson V. Shock Focusing Phenomena. Springer. 2019. 158 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75866-4
- 6. Георгиевский П.Ю., Левин В.А., Сутырин О.Г. Двумерные автомодельные течения, порожденные взаимодействием скачка уплотнения с областями газа пониженной плотности // Известия РАН. Механика жидкости и газа. 2010. № 2. С. 126–134. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13060414 @@ Georgievskii P.Y., Levin V.A., Sutyrin O.G. Two-dimensional self-similar flows generated by the interaction between a shock and low-density gas regions // Fluid Dynamics. 2010. V. 45. P. 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462810020134
- 7. Edney B. Anomalous Heat Transfer and Pressure Distributions on Blunt Bodies at Hypersonic Speeds in the Presence of an Impinging Shock // Aeronaut. Res. Inst. of Sweden. 1968. FTA Report 115.
- 8. Георгиевский П.Ю., Левин В.А., Сутырин О.Г. Эффект кумуляции при взаимодействии скачка уплотнения с локальной областью газа повышенной или пониженной плотности // Изв. РАН. Механика жидкости и газа. 2011. № 6. С. 146–154. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17027138 @@ Georgievskii P.Y., Levin V.A., Sutyrin O.G. Cumulation effect upon the interaction between a shock and a local gas region with elevated or lowered density // Fluid Dynamics. 2011. V. 46. P. 967–974. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462811060147
- 9. Georgievskiy P.Yu., Levin V.A., Sutyrin O.G. Interaction of a Shock with Elliptical Gas Bubbles // Shock Waves. 2015. V. 25. P. 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-015-0557-4
- 10. Георгиевский П.Ю., Левин В.А. Нестационарное взаимодействие сферы с атмосферными температурными неоднородностями в сверхзвуковом потоке // Известия РАН. Механика жидкости и газа. 1993. № 4. С. 174–183. @@ Georgievskii P.Y., Levin V.A. Unsteady interaction of a sphere with atmospheric temperature inhomogeneity at supersonic speed // Fluid Dynamics. 1993. V. 28. P. 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01342694
- 11. Yan H., Adelgren R., Bogushko M., Elliott G., Knight D. Laser Energy Deposition in Quiescent Air // AIAA J. 2003. V. 41. № 10. P. 1988–1995. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1888
- 12. Schulein A., Zheltovodov A., Pimonov E., Loginov M. Experimental and Numerical Modeling of the Bow Shock Interaction with Pulse-Heated Air Bubbles // Int. J. of Aerospace Innovations. 2010. V. 2. № 3. P. 165–187.
- 13. Ohnishi N., Tate M., Ogino Y. Computational Study of Shock Wave Control by Pulse Energy Deposition // Shock Waves. 2012. V. 22. P. 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-012-0407-6
- 14. Georgievskiy P., Levin V., Sutyrin O. Shock Focusing Effect for The Interaction of Blunt Bodies with Gas Bubbles in a Supersonic Flow // In: Ben-Dor G., Sadot O., Igra O. (eds) 30th International Symposium on Shock Waves 2. Springer, Cham. 2017. P. 1023–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44866-4_42
- 15. Левин В.А., Марков В.В., Журавская Т.А. Прямое инициирование детонации в водородовоздушной смеси сходящейся ударной волной // Химическая физика. 2001. Т. 20. № 5. С. 26–30.
- 16. Haehn N., Ranjan D., Weber C., Oakley J., Rothamer D., Bonazza R. Reacting shock bubble interaction // Combustion and Flame. 2012. V. 159. № 3. P. 1339–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.10.015
- 17. Diegelmann F., Tritschler V., Hickel S., Adams N. On the pressure dependence of ignition and mixing in twodimensional reactive shock-bubble interaction // Combustion and Flame. 2016. V. 163. P. 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.10.016
- 18. Георгиевский П.Ю., Левин В.А., Сутырин О.Г. Инициирование детонации при взаимодействии ударной волны с горючим газовым пузырем различной плотности // Физика горения и взрыва. 2022. Т. 58.№ 5. С. 72–78. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49450532 @@ Georgievskiy P.Y., Levin V.A., Sutyrin O.G. Detonation Initiation upon Interaction of a Shock Wave with a Combustible Gas Bubble of Various Densities // Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves. 2022. V. 58. P. 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508222050094
- 19. MacCormack R.W. The Effect of Viscosity in Hypervelocity Impact Cratering // AIAA Paper 69-354. 1969. 7 p., https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1969-354 (also published in J. Spacecraft and Rockets. 2003. V. 40. № 5. P. 757–763. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6901)
- 20. Жмакин А.И., Фурсенко А.А. Об одной монотонной разностной схеме сквозного счета // Ж. вычисл. матем. и матем. физ. 1980. Т. 20. № 4. С. 1021–1031. @@ Zhmakin A., Fursenko A. On a Monotonic Shock-Capturing Difference Scheme // USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. 1980. V. 20. № 4. P. 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553 (80)90283-9
- 21. Liska R., Wendroff B. Comparison of several difference schemes on 1D and 2D test problems for the Euler equations // SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 2003. V. 25. № 3. P. 995–1017. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827502402120
- 22. Физика взрыва / Под ред. Л.П. Орленко. Изд. 3-е, испр. В 2 т. Т. 1. М.: Физматлит, 2004. 832 с. ISBN 5-9221-0219-2
- 23. Крайко А.Н. Теоретическая газовая динамика: классика и современность. М.: ТОРУС Пресс, 2010. 440 с.
